You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘politics’ tag.
Readers may recall the decision of the Carpentersville Village Board earlier this year to pull funding for the Ride-In-Kane program, that provides transportation to disabled and senior residents.
This past weekend, an editorial published in the Courier-News asked Carpentersville to reconsider. The letter makes an important point about the decision of the Carpentersville Village Board to put this important program at risk, but there are a few things that need to be clarified for “jeffwardsun@sbcglobal.net” that will hopefully provide some perspective to him and others.
To be fair, Ed Ritter was not village president when the RIK funding was cut, but he wouldn’t return my calls, either.
While it is true that “Ed Ritter was not village president” at the time the funding was cut, he was a significant part of the cut. He was a member of the Audit & Finance Commission that recommended the cut, and he voted with Kay Teeter, Judy Sigwalt and Paul Humpfer for cutting the funding. In fact, of the present Board members, only Keith Hinz voted to provide the funding to Ride In Kane.
So, its not surprising that neither he nor Paul Humpfer returned “jeffwardsun’s” phone calls. They lack accountability … and feel no need to serve anyone but themselves.
In March, [Township Supervisor Sue] Harney went before the village board to plead RIK’s case. She told me the trustees were “very hostile” and Trustee Paul Humpfer was especially “ruthless.” Humpfer berated Harney and the township specifically for using a modified cash basis accounting system when, as it turns out, the village does the same thing.
Others will find it interesting that, in that exchange, Humpfer — chair of the Audit & Finance Commission — did not even understand that the Village was on the cash basis system. And he was criticizing Harney?! The Village’s mismanagement of funds is well known, and became infamous several years ago when the Village failed 4 consecutive audits. Humpfer gets credit for “fixing” this, but how can we believe a guy who doesn’t even understand the Village’s accounting system fixed problems? The answer … we can’t and don’t.
But, to the matter at hand, the Board will not go back and reconsider this because the majority of the Board was responsible for pulling the cash in the first place. They’re too busy for that anyway … changing laws to allow alcohol in the park for a music fest (when several years ago at least one member of the current Board said that ice cream trucks selling treats to kids were dangerous, and the current Board thought it was a problem to have a few small buses be able to park in driveways overnight).
Enjoy!
For about four months, bus drivers in Carpentersville have patiently waited an answer from the Village Board as to whether they could park their buses at their homes between routes.
On Tuesday night, the Village Board said “no”, instead opting only for a change in the ordinance that would increase the allowable GVWR (gross vehicle weight rating) for vehicles parked in residential neighborhoods.
The amendment now allows for vehicles having a GVWR of up to 10,000 lbs to be parked overnight in residents’ driveways. However, vehicles with a GVWR between 8,001 and 10,000 lbs will require a higher priced Village sticker.
According to the Courier News, Village Attorney Jim Rhodes presented six options to the Board for consideration, including one to allow bus drivers to park their vehicles at their homes. But, according to the Courier, the Board rejected that option primarily because “area school districts vetoed that option last month because of insurance liability”.
So, that wraps up the majority of what has consumed the Board for the last several months.
I do want to give some kudos to the Village for moving quickly to do some surface improvements along Huntley Rd. It was horrible and a real embarrassment.
As regular readers know, and new visitors can see, I’ve been very critical of the way members of the Board have conducted themselves over the past several years. But I’d like to draw a distinction between criticism of behavior or action and the presentation of feedback, input or commentary on issues.
I feel that the Board needs to seek out, and actually consider, input, advice and opinions from a wider base of the community and experts on the matters. And, they should be open to accepting such input even from those who are critical of actions they have taken in the past.
This seems to be something that at least some members of the Board have thus far been unwilling to do, and has been most recently evident in the discussion of amending the parking ordinance for buses and large personal vehicles.
A recent decision by President Ritter Ed to no longer allow public comment during Board discussion of ordinances and other actions creates a situation where the Board could take action on a matter without the public being able to weigh in with specific information – whether opinions or from experts.
It seems to be a means to stifle public input into issues of concern to the community. Unfortunately, a prevalent philosophy of some Board members is to ignore — and often, in turn, criticize — those members of the community.
Board members should expect criticism from members of the community if they take actions that are seen as problematic; especially if such Board members are initiators or champions of a particular issue. Likewise, residents should be encouraged to voice such criticisms without fear of being cut off from the dialog.
Now, some have considered my criticisms to be be “personal”. But, as I said in a comment recently on this blog, they are not “personal” at all. But, they are distinct from being input or feedback. Instead, the nature of those comments are specifically aimed at actions engaged in which are illegal, unethical and/or complicit with such behavior. Such actions by elected officials deserve no mercy or “constructive criticism” because engaging in them undermines the rights of members of the community or society.
As I said at the start, these two types of criticisms are of different and distinct natures, and both serve a purpose — both ultimately seek to serve the community in different ways. Allowing input into, and hearing criticism of, issues and legislation from experts and members of the community helps elected officials serve better. Denouncing illegal, unethical and corrupt behavior engaged in by elected officials helps the community be better informed, so they may choose officials that respect them (and remove officials that don’t).
To weigh in on this matter of the ordinance prohibiting vehicles in excess of 8,000lbs from being owned and parked at residences in the Village (which have been debated in the comments of the “Ritter/challenge” entry), I have to say that I find that there are matters that the existing ordinance addresses that are important to the maintenance and safety of the community and its residents. That said, I also find that there are cases where the existing ordinance unknowingly, unintentionally or unwittingly prohibits passenger vehicles from being owned and stored at residences in the Village. Additionally, ordinances should take into account the sizable population of working class citizens who are residents of the Village.
I think it is good that the Board has asked for a revised ordinance to address these matters, and also provide exclusions that would allow certain buses to be parked at residences, which also are of benefit to the community.
So, those two things are good.
What I find disheartening, however, is that some members of the Board — Trustee Sigwalt, in particular — are using this ordinance in a discriminatory manner; specifically to harass a business owner in the Village, and perhaps others, as a matter of politics. I believe that it establishes a dangerous precedent — with evidence that it was long established, and is now commonplace — that damages the image and credibility of the Board, the Community Development Division (specifically code enforcement officers), and also the reputation of the Village itself.
Steps may be taken by those involved to ensure that such commentary and prejudices do not “leak” to the public in the future, however, that is no assurance of protection against such.
Again, this is another case where there must be a show of good faith on the part of the government, that it will listen to the people when they bring objections; and that they will be properly addressed. The passage of exceptions granted for non-commercial vehicles, and certain school buses is a start to demonstration of that commitment.
The Daily Herald sat down to talk to Ed Ritter about his plans and intentions as the newly elected Village President of Carpentersville.
In answer to a question about how his leadership style will be different, Ritter responded, in part:
[T]o be much more inclusive of the trustees. There were a lot of issues and decisions that we never heard about or never knew about. It was very frustrating. I am still learning about things that Bill made decisions on that we never knew about. Negotiations that were going on that none of us knew about.
So, how will Ritter handle “negotiations … going on that none of [them] knew about”? Here is a fresh challenge to see if Ritter will make good on his promise…
At Tuesday’s upcoming meeting, the current Village Board will be discussing whether to revise the Municipal Code allowing school buses to be parked overnight at residences. Setting aside the discussion of the actual issue for a moment, it seems that there have been some negotiations taking place.
Despite this being an issue the current Village Board is considering and will likely decide at the meeting on April 21, Judy Sigwalt did not inform Bill Sarto and Linda Ramirez Sliwinski of the outside discussions taking place, or include them on the email that appears in the correlated posting.
How will Ed Ritter handle this first test? Will he call out Judy Sigwalt the way he has Bill Sarto? (Yes, Ritter has made complaints at Village Board meetings about not having been informed.)
Or, will Ritter handle this situation with quiet acceptance the way he did with Humpfer’s domestic battery convication, violations of the Open Meetings Act, and other deceptions and unethical behavior by his allies?
In order for Ritter to do what he says he will do — “set a new course for Carpentersville” — he is going to have to stop this type of behavior. I would love for Ritter to surprise me and actually take on Judy Sigwalt and tell her that she was wrong for not including Sarto and Ramirez-Sliwinski. Unfortunately, I don’t think he will. And the pattern of double standards and backroom negotiations and corruption will continue to be “respected” in Carpentersville.
See the post below “Sigwalt’s exclusionary email” for the email mentioned above.
From: JUDY SIGWALT [mailto:newportt2000@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 8:34 PM
To: Cindy McCammack ; Craig Anderson ; E Ritter ; K Teeter ; PatS ; paul humpfer; [Paul Lanspa]
Subject: school bus drivers
Hi All, I just got a call from Paul Lanspa about the PCZ meeting. I’m relaying what he said at his request. Paul Lanspa asked if he should contact Craig Anderson . I suggested he should so Craig is not blindsided.
The school bus drivers showed up at the PZC meeting with protest signs in a pile and said a lawyer contacted them (the bus drivers) this week about their problem with parking their buses in the village. The bus drivers said they would be at our Tuesday board meeting.
It is Paul Lanspas thought, if they get a lawyer Krenz or Roeser will pay for it. Paul Lanspa said every time the bus drivers came before them Krenz was in attendance with them. Paul Lanspa believes it is because Krenz was parking his Amy plumbing trucks frequently in their subdivision of Spring Acre Hills. When he was told by the SAH/HOA he could not do this and they put a stop to it, Paul Lanspa said Krenz became very indignant and said he was doing some plumbing at his Mothers house.
Paul Lanspa believes Krenz has a stake in this issue as he wants to park his commercial vehicles in the subdivision. Paul Lanspa said he’s not opposed to granting a variance to the bus drivers as long as there’s a strong exclusion on all other commercial vehicles as we all are trying to improve the looks of our village.
Please email Keith and Brad for me. If you have any questions of Paul Lanspa his email is [redacted]. feel free to contact him. The PCZ continued the agenda item.
Take Care Judy
Just the kind of “respect” and “class” that Sarto has had to deal with over the years from members of the Board. This was Sigwalt’s comments to Sarto after Tuesday’s election. You decide if she was not an antagonizer.
From: JUDY SIGWALT <newportt2000@yahoo.com>
To: WRS1114@aol.com
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 23:58:58 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Buh, Bye! Judy
Some may have wondered at the comments being closed and turned off on past postings. (And I will delete comments in this and future posts that try to use it to address older ones.) I want to reassure you that I have not closed this blog, now that the election has passed.
On the contrary, I started this blog to report on the things that were not being reported in Carpentersville. To give a fuller story about who was behind the majority of the rancor and factiousness on the Board.
No, this blog is not shut down.
I am just preparing for a new chapter for this blog, and wanted to make a bit of a break from the old chapter.
This blog will still be used to report on what is happening in Carpentersville Village government. I invite people to check back starting next week to see and participate in the metamorphosis of Carpentersville Action Network.
I intend to have a posting or two up before the end of the week to wrap up the election and the newly elected Village Board.
Today is the day that many of us have long awaited.
The chance for your vote to be your voice. The chance to send a message to those who have ignored the community in pursuit of their own self interests, and that of a privileged few.
You have been given the information, now is the time to see that it gets put to good use.
With Bill Sarto as Village President, and Trustee Linda Ramirez-Sliwinski also supporting the community, Carpentersville has been moved forward in the last 4 years.
Yes, there has been animosity and argument on the Board because those of the old political machine (Sigwalt, Ritter, Teeter, Humpfer) fought hard against that progress. Sarto and Sliwinski fought back … for the people of Carpentersville … to see that progress was made.
Today, go out and cast your vote, if you haven’t already, to support Sarto and Sliwinski and ensure that progress continues.
And, help them be able to work better and more effectively for the Village by also voting for two additional Trustees that will participate in those efforts: Ken Andresen, Joe Haimann and/or Debra Lowen (listed alphabetically by last name). Schultz and McFeggan are part of that old, factious, disruptive regime that must be thrown out of Carpentersville government for good.
Carpentersville can not afford to be held back any longer. Make sure the progress that Sarto and Sliwinski started can continue without the disruptions they have had to deal with and fight through during the past 4 years.
Some voting locations have been recently changed. You can go to the Kane County Elections website to see where you are supposed to vote, if you are unsure.
Four more days until we know who voters want to guide the Village of Carpentersville for the next 4 years. A letter in the Daily Herald today expresses support for Ritter, Teeter, Schultz and McFeggan. The only reason? Because they were not ever supported by the Roeser’s.
Yeah, I agree, it’s pretty thin — and not a good reason to vote for or against anyone. But, its typical because none of the Ritter, Teeter, Schultz, McFeggan supporters have been able to explain anything that those 4 have done for the Village. But they say we should vote for those 4? Why?!
What does anyone have against 4 more years of action and progress in this Village?
Sarto got the capital improvement program moving, and funded it without raising taxes. He has improved this Village IN SPITE of the antics and interference by these Board members.
Four years of Ritter, Teeter, Schultz and McFeggan is four years of the kind of foot dragging we had in the years before Sarto and Sliwinski got in. The roads and sidewalks are a good example. They were hemming and hawing for months about whether to do it and how to pay for it. Any talk was just for show, I’m sure, since they were already planning for Paul Humpfer to run for Village President. Like Judy and Paul started the illegal immigration talk; for the election.
When Humpfer ran, his resume was paper-thin – he needed to act like he was doing something. And the resumes of Ritter, Teeter, Schultz and McFeggan are paper-thin too. So, they used the Carpentersville Improvement Committee to establish their campaign–even campaigning while acting on behalf of the Village. (They attributed the CIC work to themselves -and the immigration group, not the Village committee.) We can’t afford to go back to a do-nothing era.
A week from today most voters — except those who took advantage of early voting options — will go to the polls to select candidates for local Village, Township and School District offices.
For the position of Village President of Carpentersville, there has been a lot of talk but history only shows action by one single candidate: Bill Sarto.
Sarto is the only candidate who has consistently done what is right for Carpentersville.
Continually looking the other way at crime, unethical behavior and other such abuses, Ed Ritter does not have the ability to do what is right for the people of Carpentersville. He has shown several times that he will shrink back in fear in the face of controversy — not to mention kowtow to Judy Sigwalt and Paul Humpfer.
Jim Krenz also has simply not been there when it has counted and this seems more like a consolation effort to his failed campaign vs Illinois State Representative Tim Schmitz last year.
Dealing with and removing those problematic elements from the Board will only come by the voice of the people in this and the next election — which can start by not electing Ritter and Trustee Kay Teeter.
In contrast, Sarto has shown effectiveness at minimizing the detrimental impact of the Sigwalt/Humpfer/Ritter/Teeter bloc on the Board.
This is recognized even at other levels of government who have asked Sarto to be part of several Board and Committees that have helped bring back money and services to Carpentersville.
Sarto has been good for Carpentersville, launching several efforts that had been sorely needed and requested by the community: fixing streets and sidewalks, bringing festivals and parades back to the Village (which some current Board members said couldn’t be done), and securing funding from county, state and federal grants that have allowed Carpentersville to hold the line on taxes. (By contrast, Ritter, Teeter, Sigwalt and Humpfer were responsible for losing funds for services in the Village.)
Ritter and Krenz only offer to make Village meetings more orderly; something Sarto was praised for actually doing early in his first term.
Carpentersville cannot afford to lose the progress that has been made under Sarto’s leadership in exchange for some promise of polite conversation. We need some one who will not only talk tough, but actually be tough on corruption and dishonesty in government.
Bill Sarto is the only candidate for Village President who will not only do what is right for the People of Carpentersville in the future, but has a proven track record of actually doing it.
Carpentersville has been, and will continue to be, well served by Bill Sarto as Village President.
[Update – 7:50am – Bill Sarto has a posting at his blog that explains more about the good things and progress he has made for the Village. Read it by going to About Carpentersville.]
Yesterday, I alerted readers to probable conflicts with the use of “Carpentersville Cares” as the campaign slogan of Ed Ritter, Kay Teeter, Pat Schultz and Brad McFeggan. The conflict is due to the phrase being established as a mark of service for official Village activities conducted by the Carpentersville Improvement Committee (CIC).
There has been a lot of interest in this particular issue as evidenced by the large number of hits on that article. So, today, I present more information about the CIC, and try to fill-in some of the missing pieces for fellow residents in the community about problematic issues with the CIC.
The idea for the CIC was hatched in mid-2007. When appointments were made to the committee in October 2007, Trustees Ritter, Teeter and Humpfer all tried to get Trustee Sigwalt appointed — so that the committee would comprise Sigwalt, Teeter, and Schultz, along with the 2 other resident members. Enough to establish the bloc that they needed to accomplish their goals, and which, now, seems to have been part of their plan from the start.
The intent of forming this group appears absolutely clear now — to establish this Committee and use it to achieve the agenda of a political group. Sigwalt, Ritter, Teeter, Humpfer, and Schultz appear to have all been complicit in this scheme. In fact, in meeting minutes recorded September 2, 2008, Ed Ritter was already referring to the CIC as the “Carpentersville Cares Committee” — a reference to the phrase now used in his campaign.
As was noted in a previous posting, this group has not come up with solutions for any of the problems which they were formed to address. Instead, they have merely used this group as an extension of the Fox Valley Citizens for Legal Immigration group that they established for the last election.
This is evidenced by Judy Sigwalt’s own admission that she was attributing this Committee’s work to the Fox Valley Citizens for Legal Immigration:
Trustee Sigwalt worked on the CIC project cleaning up yards and did wear her Fox Valley Citizens For Legal Immigration shirt. She distributed flyers to area residents who were aware of what the organization stood for. She discussed the positive feedback the volunteers received from the neighbors and the number of people that have asked for assistance from them.
[Source: Village Board Meeting Minutes, October 7, 2008]
In other words, Trustee Sigwalt was campaigning and politicking while she was supposed to be working as a volunteer on behalf of the Village of Carpentersville, under the direction of the CIC. It is probable that after discovery of Sigwalt and Humpfer having exploited their trustee positions to obtain the use of Village conference rooms for meetings held with the Fox Valley Citizens for Legal Immigration, they suggested the formation of the CIC in an attempt to legitimize any such usage in the future, so they could call it a “volunteer meeting”.
This also explains why greater efforts had not previously been made to involve more members of the community (and why some were even unaware of the existence of the Committee’s “clean-up days”.)
Simply outrageous!! Yet there is more…
The first signs that the CIC put up at the sites they were working on contained the logo/initials for Fox Valley Citizens (FVCLI). These signs were apparently paid for by FVCLI.
Why was a political special interest group like FVCLI allowed to pay for signage and other materials that were for an official Village committee?
After the Oct. 7 Village Board meeting that brought to light several legal and ethical problems with recent CIC activity — and potentially fearing that some may be on to their scheme — the CIC established rules that volunteers not wear clothing that advertised or said things that might be offensive to some. When told that these signs could not be placed on the property, Trustee Humpfer said he gave permission for the signs. (Paul Humpfer is not a member of the CIC, but is a founding member of FVCLI. Furthermore, he had no authority to allow this.)
At the Oct. 22 meeting of the CIC they were directed that state law and local zoning ordinance prohibited them from putting up any signs in the future at the sites they were landscaping.
Putting “Carpentersville Cares” signs in yards of abandoned house where the CIC has made improvements – This cannot be done.
(Cindy [McCammack] later checked and these or similar signs cannot be placed in any residentially zoned area with or without the consent of the property owner. To do so is a violation of the Zoning Ordinance)
And to think that the CIC was actually violating the very Codes that they were supposed to be raising awareness of!
Also at that meeting, “Carpentersville Cares” t-shirts were unveiled. According to published meeting minutes from previous meetings, nothing with this language had been discussed.
Shirts will have “Carpentersville Cares” on the front.
Shirts were white with red lettering.
“Improvement Committee” will be printed on the back
The “white with red lettering” matches the “Carpentersville Cares” campaign signage of Ritter, Teeter, Schultz and McFeggan. However, other members of the group requested the shirts have “Carpentersville Improvement Committee” and the Village logo on it, in neon with black lettering.
Why was the Chairperson of the Committee attempting to get shirts that would advertise a campaign slogan for her and other members of the slate she was to be a part of?
The CIC, like the Fox Valley Citizen for Legal Immigration before them, was created as a political group to try to get campaign support for this election.
Considering this information, and that Trustees Sigwalt, Humpfer, Ritter and Teeter — plus Schultz and members of the FVCLI — appear to be running this Committee, members of this group should be removed from the Carpentersville Improvement Committee immediately and should be required to pay back the taxpayers any materials and related costs. It should be paid back from donations to their political campaigns because, for all intents and purposes, this should be classified as campaign activity.
In fact, I would encourage other residents to contact the Kane County Clerk, Jack Cunningham, ( Email: elections@co.kane.il.us Address: 719 SOUTH BATAVIA AVENUE, P. O. BOX 70 GENEVA, IL 60134, Phone: 630/232-5990, Fax: 630/232-5870 ) and the Illinois State Board of Elections to investigate these matters as possible campaign violations by members of this group who engaged in election activity while working on behalf of the Village.
Or, you can do the next best thing and not vote for any of those involved. Say “no” to Ed Ritter, Kay Teeter, Pat Schultz and Brad McFeggan.
We have seen that Trustees Sigwalt and Humpfer appear to have no problem using their office to do and use things — like Village property — to which they are not entitled.
So, it is probably no great surprise that those who are part of their group — Ed Ritter, Kay Teeter, Pat Schultz and Brad McFeggan — decided to “borrow” a Village-sanctioned service mark to use as the label for their own political purposes.
The “Carpentersville Cares” slogan became a service mark of the Village of Carpentersville when it was made a brand associated with the Carpentersville Improvement Committee. This is something that Chairperson Pat Schultz — now running for Trustee — should have known and not allowed to be used as a campaign slogan because of the appearance of conflict of interest that it creates.
However, Patricia “Pat” Schultz has allowed other things that she should have known about and not have allowed — including violating Village zoning ordinances and Illinois state statues, when she and other volunteers did unsanctioned work on several properties in the Village while acting in the capacity of the Improvement Committee.
The team of Ritter, Teeter, Schultz and McFeggan seem to be not only foolhardy, but their lack of necessary knowledge and reckless behavior could prove to be downright dangerous for the Village of Carpentersville.
[Read Part 2: Taxpayers paying for Ritter team campaign? for even more information about how this Committee is engaged in campaign activity]
Supporters of the “Carpentersville Cares” team of Ed Ritter, Kay Teeter, Pat Schultz and Brad McFeggan have posted an entry on their blog that refer directly to African-Americans as “monkeys”.
They are apparently trying to draw attention to an incident that occurred last year where Trustee Linda Ramirez Sliwinski was issued a disorderly conduct citation for telling two children to stop climbing in trees like monkeys. The citation was thrown out on Constitutional grounds, particularly because it was clear that Sliwinski’s reference was in no way considered a racial epithet.
Still, supporters of the “Carpentersville Cares” team have continually tried to imply that it was a racist statement. In doing so, they have created entries that actually do call African-American residents “monkeys”.
The most recent posting contains several pictures of monkeys and makes comments such as the following:
Apparently, this an act of revenge after Carpentersville Trustee Linda Ramirez Sliwinski chased monkees out of her neighbor’s tree. After the “chasing those monkees incident,” the family of monkees moved out of the neighborhood.
These monkees only do jobs, that illegal aliens refuse to do. They’re just trying to make a living and raise their families here in Carpentersville.
They pay taxes and enjoy spending their money at local pubs.
None of this is a surprise since the “Carpentersville Cares” team has apparently decided to use their Board and Committee positions to take action against those whom they deem undesirable.
The following is a re-post of an article published November 27, 2007. It was part of a 5-part series titled “The Trouble in Carpentersville”, which aimed to explain who and what was behind the years of turmoil that fractured several Village Boards (no, the problems were there well before the current Village President was elected in 2005). It remains relevant and is good for voters to know as we head into the final few weeks of the 2009 campaign. Worthy of note is that “Sigwalt and Co.” is short-hand for a group that includes candidates in this election: Ed Ritter, Kay Teeter, Pat Schultz and Brad McFeggan.
[[Follow these links to read Introduction, Part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4 and part 5]]
The Board elected in 2005, with 4 new members, didn’t get off on a good foot due to the last minute appointments and 11th-hour approvals that came at the hands of an outgoing Board. There were some bumpy roads caused by more than the crumbling infrastructure in the wake of years of neglect.
Yet by the end of 2005, the papers were congratulating the Board for having found some direction and cohesiveness that hadn’t been seen in years; things were getting done, and they were crediting Sarto with being the key in moving the Village forward and bringing the Board together:
At their last village board meeting of the year, Carpentersville’s leaders Tuesday gave themselves a pat on the back for their newfound cohesion after a history of fractious government.
Comparing Carpentersville and East Dundee as towns heading in opposite directions, the Daily Herald wrote:
Carpentersville’s government, for years notorious for its ugly public spats, has been humming along pleasantly for the past several months.
[…]
Now, board members spend more time thanking each other and laughing at each other’s jokes than debating each other at board meetings. When disputes do arise, they lack the biting tone they once had.
[…]
The turnaround came, according to both Sarto and Humpfer, when the men met to discuss their differences, agreed they needed to compromise, and made shows of good faith.
The eutopia on the Board — with a few disagreements here and there — lasted through the better part of 2006, as well. However, there was still some animosity carried over from the earlier actions of the outgoing Board. Not only was the appointment of Trustee Humpfer without consideration of others for the position both suspect and underhanded, but also the 11th-hour deal on Pulte’s Winchester Glen subdivisions.
The distrust caused some finger-pointing, mostly between Sarto and Sigwalt, and charges of ulterior motives.
Yet, it was Sarto who repeatedly reached out to try to mend fences and bring the Board together to be able to work on the things that needed to be done in Carpentersville.
In July, the Daily Herald commented:
Almost three months after he demanded his political rival resign his appointed trustee seat, Carpentersville Village President Bill Sarto says he will appoint trustee Paul Humpfer, an auditor, to an advisory financial panel. Sarto also plans to appoint former Trustee Nancy Moore’s husband, banker Donald Moore, whose offers to help previously had been rejected.
“We can’t keep fighting,” Humpfer said.
Well, you could – but this is so much better.
[Source: Daily Herald editorial, July 2, 2005]
While Sarto was reaching out though, you could almost sense that it would not be well received by Sigwalt and Co:
New Carpentersville President Bill Sarto named the man who ran against him the chairman of the newly merged audit and finance commission this week. “I think he’s capable of handling this, and hopefully this can heal some of the past wounds,” Sarto said of Paul Humpfer’s appointment. “I’m doing my best to bring this board together to get things done.”
In a town where political strife is constant, the move to mend a deep political schism is downright soothing. Here’s hoping Sarto also brought the Super Glue.
[Source: Daily Herald editorial, July 9, 2005]
“Super Glue”, as would be seen in later months when Sigwalt and Humpfer would continually slap Sarto’s cooperative hand, would have been nice.
Things were and have been getting done in the Village under Sarto. Sigwalt and Co were not getting the press they needed to win re-election … especially when there was a very real possibility that voters would hold them accountable for disregarding the results of the election 2 years earlier by the backdoor appointment of Paul Humpfer. So, in September 2006, with the help of the local media and backed by Sarto’s sometimes fiery penchant for pushing to get things done, they moved on the volatile illegal immigration issue.
Yesterday, the Daily Herald gave its endorsements for the Carpentersville races for President and Trustee (3 open). The majority of their choices should raise red flags with residents. The choices of Ed Ritter, Kay Teeter and Pat Schultz are an insult because these 3 have made several decisions that were opposed to the needs of the community. In choosing to endorse these 3 particular candidates, the Daily Herald Editorial Board has demonstrated they are not on the side of Carpentersville residents.
The choice of Linda Ramirez-Sliwinski is the only one that seems logical. As the only Hispanic member of the Board in a town that is approximately 40% Latino, Ramirez Sliwinski has been a strong, rational advocate and representative for Carpentersville — not merely its Hispanic residents.
However, the other choices are part of a slate that has been consistently troublesome for Village residents. Recent events also provide some of additional examples.
First, there is the decision not to contribute funds to the Ride In Kane program. Trustees Ritter, Teeter, Humpfer and Sigwalt voted against contributing $13,412 to the program (which would have been matched dollar for dollar by a federal grant).
Trustees Paul Humpfer and Judy Sigwalt, evidently speaking for the group, said that contributing funds to this program was “unfair to taxpayers” whose taxes at both the Township and municipal levels would be contributed to the program. (Interestingly, these members of the Board voted contrary to the recommendation of the Audit & Finance Commission; Humpfer and Ritter are on the Commission and dissented.)
Contrast this with another recent decision where they voted in favor of hiking the fees on rental properties by nearly 300%. Surrounding communities don’t charge anything close to the $500 for registration, licensing and inspection of rental properties. The Carpentersville charge is not only for apartments, but also for single family attached and detached homes.
This effects business development in town too, because it discourages investment properties that fill the homes that are presently vacant. Businesses want to locate in bustling communities. Vacant homes have a negative impact on property values, and continue a negative chain of events that become a deterrent to vital improvements and services.
It basically works like a hidden tax. So, on the one hand, they try to make people believe they support taxpayers by not contributing to the Ride in Kane/Dial A Ride which serves the residents of the Village and with the other hand, they increase the cost to live or work in the Village.
In other words, Ritter, Teeter, Humpfer and Sigwalt favor increasing taxes while decreasing services.
Does that sound like a team that “Cares” to you?
So, who is really fighting for the residents of the Village?
Village President Bill Sarto and Trustee Linda Ramirez-Sliwinski.
The Daily Herald tried to say that Sarto has been “a divisive force in the Village”. But, the reality is that Sarto has been under attack since his election in 2005 (before he ever took the oath of Office). You may recall that Sarto’s defeated opponent, Paul Humpfer, was reappointed to the Board after the 2005 election, over and above the objections from residents and business owners in the Village. Humpfer, along with Trustee Sigwalt, gathered a group of residents — that included Pat Schultz, candidate for Trustee — to conspire against Sarto, and interfere with the ability to conduct Village business. All this is well known to everyone, except, apparently the Daily Herald Editorial Board.
I attempted to provide this comment in response to the editorial, but it was removed from the site shortly after being posted:
This is no surprise that the Daily Herald chose Ritter, Teeter and Schultz. But, there are few things that stand out…
First, Sarto didn’t pursue a criminal conviction. Humpfer was convicted, and Sarto rightly decided that a domestic battery (not simple assault, but actual battery … with a weapon no less) was grounds for removal of a Trustee. However, Ritter and Teeter, falling in line behind Sigwalt and Humpfer, voted to change the rules.
Then, the majority of the endorsement simply appears as a rail against Sarto, who has been on the receiving end of some very serious transgressions by some Trustees, starting before he even took office.
This endorsement by the editorial board leaves out crucial facts, and even misdirects those they chose to include. In reality, Ritter will be what he has been, a quiet puppet for a group that does most of their business in the back room, not the Board room. Residents should be grateful to Sarto for making those acts known.
Voters are encouraged to learn the whole truth of who was behind all the dissension on the Board.
There is further evidence right on the Daily Herald site of Sarto being on the receiving end of a constant barrage of attacks from the same group who regularly disrupted Village Board meetings at the probable prompting of Trustees Sigwalt and Humpfer (with the apparent approval of Ritter and Teeter who did nothing about it, and in fact opposed Sarto in trying to stop it). These people created aliases (in some cases multiple aliases) — including some members of the Board and Commissions/Committees — to continue their attacks on Sarto and Sliwinski.
Ramirez-Sliwinski has also found herself a target of the attacks by this group, as seemed to be the case in a citation that was ultimately tossed out as a violation of her constitutional rights.
Additionally, the Daily Herald Editorial Board wants you to believe that those whom they endorsed were responsible for the improvements and progress that have been made in the Village over the past 4 years. Yet the Daily Herald Editorial Board’s fiction doesn’t square with reality.
It was not until Sarto and Sliwinski were voted in that such progress was made, even though Sigwalt and Humpfer had been on the Board prior to the election. It is important to note that Sarto was bringing the Board together, which several sources noted. It was Sarto whom was credited with finally bringing cohesion to the Board, proving that he most certainly can work with anyone who is not trying to rain chaos on Village government.
The Daily Herald Editorial Board must either have a short memory or a hidden agenda to make some of the claims they do in their editorial. Interesting, that the Editorial Board now refers to Ed Ritter as “Sarto’s chief rival on the Board”, an honor that they regularly bestowed on Trustees Humper and Sigwalt, depending on the point they were trying to make. Apparently they are using it to fit their agenda here too.
Yes, I know that I have written much here and it can be a lot to digest, but I feel that the people of Carpentersville deserve such level of detail, in order to be able to weigh the evidence for what is being claimed. This blog is filled with articles that are backed with much evidence, from Board and Committee Meeting Minutes, news stories, and credible and verifiable information from websites. I hope you will notice a quality to the writing and information provided that distinguishes this site from others that are only interested in using it as a forum to continue their attack on Sarto and Sliwinski.
The time has come to stand up and show these people that you will not sit quietly and let a certain segment of the Board, and a certain element of the community, control what happens in Carpentersville. Use your vote on April 7th to send a message to those who have wreaked havoc on this community; to Judy Sigwalt, Paul Humpfer, Ed Ritter, Kay Teeter and Pat Schultz. Say “No” to their brand of divisive politics. Let them know that you are mad as hell and are not going to take it any more.
Support Sarto and Ramirez-Sliwinski. And choose two additional Trustees from the group of Debra Lowen, Joe Haimann, or Ken Andresen.
With Ritter and Teeter out, and the addition of Andresen, Haimann and/or Lowen — who are also ready and able to serve — Sarto and Sliwinski will no longer have to fight through the divisiveness, allowing them to work better and faster for the residents of the Village.
The Courier-News reported on last night’s candidates forum sponsored by the Committee of Clergy in Carpentersville.
The answers by the candidates for Village President were very similar to those raised on last week’s WRMN radio show, Politics & Issues.
The inadequacy of Ed Ritter (and the rest of the “Carpentersville Cares” ticket) has been well covered, so there is no need to go over it again. Ritter and the “Cares” team have nothing to offer the residents of Carpentersville.
But, what about Jim Krenz? There has been mention of him in articles and at these forums, but there has been little presented about what he stands for or what he would do for the people of Carpentersville.
In the Courier article, he is quoted as saying he “chose not to stand by as the antics and mismanagement of a few bring our village to a standstill”.
Now, first of all, things have hardly been at a “standstill”. In spite of the best efforts of a segment of Trustees, things have moved forward in the Village.
But where was Krenz when all this “Trouble in Carpentersville” was going on? He has not spoken at a Board meeting, and — to my knowledge — hasn’t written even a Letter to the Editor opposing the “antics and mismanagement of a few”.
If Jim Krenz had the ability to lead that he says he does, why did he not rally people to put a stop to these “antics” when they were occurring? It seems that reality doesn’t match his rhetoric.
President Bill Sarto, on the other hand, has shown a record of opposing these “antics”, even when there was a calculated effort by some members on the Board to create chaos and stop Village business.
What would Krenz have done differently?
Ed Ritter answered saying that he would “work collaboratively with each other to ‘solve problems in a diplomatic and functional way’. However, Ritter, and other Trustees he has aligned himself with, shunned the idea of such collaborative sessions to work through differences when it was suggested, and Sarto supported the idea. Therefore, while it may sound good, it becomes just campaign rhetoric because Ritter had the opportunity to do just that and didn’t.
Krenz made similar comments about “order and respect”. Yet he has not offered any opinion on how he would work differently in the situation that Sarto found himself in — a bloc of Trustees conspiring to create havoc.
How would Krenz have dealt with Trustees and Commission members’ violation(s) of the Illinois Open Meetings Act? How would he have dealt with meetings that were held at Village conference rooms at a Westside Fire Station intended for planning to disrupt Board meetings? How would he handle those who purposefully lied to Village staff about those meetings? How would he have dealt with a situation where a defeated opponent was appointed to a Trustee seat? How would he have dealt with a bloc of Trustees that did not want to remove a Trustee after a criminal conviction?
How would Krenz handle a segment of the Board that conspired to undermine any action he took from the very moment he was elected?
These are serious questions that Krenz needs to answer in order to prove that he could truly “lead by example” in a manner of “order and respect”.
In the campaign world, it’s easy to make it sound all nice and cheery … but the real world doesn’t work that way. Mr. Krenz’s “lead by example” answer just doesn’t get the job done when there is real, disciplinary action and penalties that are needed. “Respect” is not something this behavior deserves — it is that “respect” that past administrations have shown which allowed the Village to get into the mess it did BEFORE Sarto was elected.
Would Mr. Krenz take this Village back to the days of “respect” that ultimately led to things falling apart? If he would show “respect” to criminal and unethical behavior that has sought to hold Carpentersville captive, then I would have to say “yes, he would”.
Frankly, Carpentersville cannot afford to go back to those “dark days”, Mr. Krenz.
This morning on WRMN1410’s radio show, Politics & Issues, candidates for President of the Village of Carpentersville talked about issues, their reasons for running, and their plans to lead the Village.
The approximately 30-minute segment did not contain any glaring revelations about any of the candidates, as they stuck mainly to the issues they’ve already discussed and put forth on their campaign sites and literature.
After opening statements from each of the candidates, host Tom Sandor, first tossed up a question about why each candidate was running and why voters should vote for them.
Ed Ritter reiterated his campaign platform to bring a new leadership style.Jim Krenz did the same, promoting his position as a Carpentersville business owner. Bill Sarto presented the numerous items that have been accomplished during the last 4 years — also a recurring theme in Sarto’s answers.
Next, Sandor asked how each candidate interpreted the role of Village President.
All 3 candidates were in basic agreement in their answers, although Ritter added that the President was a “cheerleader”.
Things heated up briefly – but remained civil – when Sandor asked about the controversies that have occurred in the last 4 years. Sarto discussed several of the actions by Board members to undermine the ability to conduct Village business (which have been documented on this site). Ritter tried to distance himself from those actions, and Krenz seemed the odd man out in the exchange.
When the issue of meetings between some Trustees and a small group of residents was brought up, Ritter stated that he did not know if the involvement of 4 members of the Audit & Finance Commission in discussing policy was an Open Meetings Act violation. [ed. Trustee Ritter should read the Act (5 ILCS 120), which I will post relevant portions of in the comments.]
For the remainder of the time, the candidates talked about what they perceived to be the issues most important to Carpentersville residents.
Krenz said streets, vacant homes, and the collective services of police, fire and public works. Sarto said vacant homes and rebuilding streets and infrastructure, and crime. Ritter said streets, crime and business (including filling the industrial park on Rt 31), though housing is also an issue.
In their closing statement, Ritter again highlighted leadership style, that he’s worked with teams and that he thought Carpentersville could again be the best in Kane County, as they were in the days of Meadowdale Mall and the “international raceway”.
Krenz highlighted his experience, passion and planning that he says will make Carpentersville a place to be proud of.
Sarto closed by emphasizing the results produced in the last 4 years vs the talk. Carpentersville is in a better position than most surrounding towns, not having to raise taxes or lay off staff during the tough economic period. He said he has shown the ability to get things done, “things that had not been addressed in decades”, and intends to continue to build on that.
I was driving when I was listening to this, so I could not take extensive notes and have written this as soon after the program aired as I could.
There were some specific moments that I recall from the segment:
Ritter stated that there were Board planning sessions that occurred in the first year of his term, “but that stopped when the Illegal Immigration issue was brought up”. That is quite an admission of how the Illegal Immigration at the hands of Sigwalt and Humpfer, was responsible for interfering with the ability of the Board to effectively do its job.
Sarto’s statements on the Village’s finances was appropriate considering its improved state. He credited staff for their significant role in holding the line on spending, and noted the significant amount of outside money — particularly 25% of the total allocation from the Community Development Block Grant ($400,000 of $1.6million) — that he has helped bring into the Village.
As much as Trustee Ritter tried to say he was not part of the camp that led the controversies on the Board, he also did nothing to see that it was ended. Even in the segment, he defended Trustee Humpfer’s position on the Board — first getting the position in what smells very much like “pay to play” (since Humpfer received an appointment to the Trustee position shortly after working on Village finances without a contract, directive or payment), getting reappointed to a position after losing to Sarto in the 2005 election (which would have put Humpfer off the Board), and then being retained by a majority vote that included Ritter, after conviction of four counts of domestic battery. Ritter also did not question (and appeared to defend in the segment) the improper use of Village meeting rooms by Humpfer (and Sigwalt), which the Village Manager put an end to after discovering that they lied about the pupose of the meetings at a west side fire station. The actual purpose of the meetings was not a permitted use.
These are the kinds of acts which Sarto has rightly shown intolerance. Ritter and Krenz have said that they would return “respect”; but, as commenter “At a Glance” posted yesterday: “Someone needs to stand up and fight for us and if you say Krenz would be less confrontational, then he is not the person for the job!!!!” That would go equally for Ritter.
President Bill Sarto will give a State of the Village address to the Board, staff, residents and business owners tonight, March 10th, at 6:30pm in the Village Hall Board Room.
This event is open to the public. All are welcome and encouraged to attend.
Carpentersville Action Network 
Recent Comments